Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi received U.S. feedback on a seven-day trust-building plan via Qatari mediators in Doha on September 29, 2026, according to an official briefed on the talks but not identified as Iranian. The feedback, conveyed by Qatari intermediaries, was received after a meeting with Mr. Araghchi and his team on their return from the United States. The official described the feedback as outlining a seven-day period of trust-building aimed at returning the two sides to an enhanced version of the memorandum of understanding agreed in June 2026. The plan includes concrete steps on Iran's nuclear programme, though details remain unspecified.

The U.S. response to Iran's proposal, which called for the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz and normal maritime passage if conditions were met, was reportedly rejected by President Donald Trump. This rejection prompted further Qatari mediation. The official noted that the main disagreement between the two sides centers on the sequencing of the steps rather than the components of the plan. The Qatari mediators conveyed the U.S. feedback on Monday, September 28, 2026, before meeting Mr. Araghchi and his team.

The memorandum of understanding signed in June 2026 led to a brief ceasefire and included provisions on the Strait of Hormuz and Iran's nuclear programme. Qatar has been actively mediating between Washington and Tehran in an effort to end the conflict and restore maritime passage. The current plan is part of ongoing diplomatic efforts to de-escalate tensions and revive the agreement. However, the exact nature of the U.S. feedback and the specific steps proposed by Iran remain unclear, as the official did not provide further elaboration.

Mr. Araghchi is expected to discuss the U.S. response in Tehran on September 30, 2026. The official did not provide details on what the U.S. feedback contained or how it might influence the next steps in negotiations. The lack of transparency around the U.S. position and the specifics of the plan has left the situation in limbo. The official’s comments suggest that the sequencing of actions is the primary point of contention, indicating that both sides may have differing views on the timeline and order of implementing the trust-building measures.

The official’s account is the only source of information on the U.S. feedback and the current state of negotiations. The absence of direct statements from either side means that the public remains largely unaware of the specifics of the U.S. position or the potential outcomes of the proposed plan. The situation remains unresolved, with the possibility of renewed conflict or diplomatic progress hanging in the balance.

What remains unknown is the exact content of the U.S. feedback, the specific steps proposed by Iran, and the potential outcomes of the proposed trust-building measures. The official’s account provides a partial picture of the ongoing negotiations, but without further information, it is difficult to assess the likelihood of success or failure in the current diplomatic efforts. The situation continues to be monitored closely, with the international community watching for any developments that could impact regional stability and global trade.