Eminent scientist and Bharat Ratna awardee Prof C N R Rao, 92, has been issued a notice for a Special Intensive Revision (SIR) hearing over a name mismatch in Karnataka’s electoral rolls. The notice cites a discrepancy between his name in the 2002 electoral records, which list him as 'Prof C N R Rao,' and the current records, which include an extra 'f,' listing him as 'Proff C N R Rao.' The SIR process flags such mismatches when details provided by an elector in the enumeration form do not align with the current roll. Only the individual named in the notice is permitted to attend the hearing, which is scheduled in Malleshwaram near the Indian Institute of Science (IISc).

The issue has sparked debate over whether prominent figures should be exempt from such procedures. Economist Amartya Sen, also flagged for a similar spelling discrepancy, has been exempted from appearing in person, according to the Election Commission of India. However, no such exemption has been granted to Rao. His acquaintances, contacted by The Hindu, revealed that Rao is not in good health and rarely uses modern technology, as he finds phones and computers distracting. They noted that he scarcely uses a phone, rarely makes calls, and never checks his email.

Rao, a key figure in India’s science policy, has held prominent roles in advisory councils under multiple prime ministers, including Indira Gandhi, Rajiv Gandhi, H.D. Deve Gowda, I.K. Gujral, and Manmohan Singh. He has also led the Indian Institute of Science (IISc) and founded the Jawaharlal Nehru Centre for Advanced Scientific Research (JNCASR) in Jakkur, where he served as its founding president. His contributions to science, particularly in solid-state and structural chemistry, have earned him numerous accolades, including the Padma Vibhushan, Padma Shri, and Karnataka Ratna.

The notice has raised questions about the fairness of the SIR process for individuals of Rao’s stature. While the Election Commission has exempted Amartya Sen from appearing in person, no such clarification has been provided for Rao. The sources do not indicate that Rao or his representatives have responded to the notice. The matter remains unresolved, with no further details available on the hearing’s outcome or the specific procedures involved in resolving the name discrepancy.

What remains unknown is whether Rao will attend the hearing, given his reported health condition and limited engagement with modern communication. Additionally, the exact nature of the SIR process for high-profile individuals and the criteria for exemptions are not fully detailed in the available sources. The case highlights the potential challenges faced by elderly and prominent individuals in navigating bureaucratic procedures, particularly when they are less familiar with digital systems. The situation underscores the need for clear guidelines to ensure equitable treatment of all citizens, regardless of their status or age.